Screener
URA vs ORBX
Global X Uranium ETF vs Global X Space Tech ETF
Key differences
- ORBX costs 0.19% less per year.
- URA is significantly larger than ORBX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- URA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| URA | ORBX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.8B | $13M |
| Since | 2010 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 3.75% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +65.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +41.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +23.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 49.70% | — |
| Max drawdown | -61.45% | -13.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to URA and ORBX
Explore further