Screener
URA vs PBD
Global X Uranium ETF vs Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- URA costs 0.06% less per year.
- URA is significantly larger than PBD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, URA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| URA | PBD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.8B | $208M |
| Since | 2010 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 3.75% | 1.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +65.1% | +95.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +41.8% | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +23.3% | -2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 49.70% | 23.36% |
| Max drawdown | -61.45% | -75.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to URA and PBD
Explore further