Screener
URNM vs COPP
Sprott Uranium Miners Etf vs Sprott Copper Miners ETF
Key differences
- COPP costs 0.09% less per year.
- URNM is significantly larger than COPP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- URNM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| URNM | COPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.4B | $269M |
| Since | 2019 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.58% | 2.21% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +52.1% | +99.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +29.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 51.03% | 42.29% |
| Max drawdown | -50.78% | -44.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to URNM and COPP
Explore further