Screener
URNM vs NLR
Sprott Uranium Miners Etf vs VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
Key differences
- NLR costs 0.23% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, NLR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- NLR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| URNM | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.52% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.4B | $5.1B |
| Since | 2019 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.58% | 2.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +52.1% | +40.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +29.0% | +36.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.7% | +22.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 51.03% | 41.97% |
| Max drawdown | -50.78% | -34.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to URNM and NLR
Explore further