Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

URSP vs SPXU

ProShares Trust vs ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500

URSP

ProShares Trust

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$56M

SPXU

ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500

ProShares

Annual cost

0.90%

Fund size

$562M

Key differences

  • SPXU is significantly larger than URSP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • URSP follows a leveraged strategy; SPXU uses inverse.
  • SPXU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

URSPSPXU
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.90%
Fund size (AUM)$56M$562M
Since20252009
Dividend yield6.87%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyleveragedinverse
CAGR 1YN/A-52.5%
CAGR 3YN/A-43.9%
CAGR 5YN/A-35.8%
Sharpe 3YN/A-1.17
Volatility 1Y35.84%
Max drawdown-15.71%-99.61%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to URSP and SPXU