Screener
URTH vs EEMA
iShares MSCI World ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Key differences
- URTH costs 0.25% less per year.
- URTH is significantly larger than EEMA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- URTH covers global markets; EEMA covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, EEMA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| URTH | EEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9.2B | $1.3B |
| Since | 2012 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | 1.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.3% | +46.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.2% | +22.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.1% | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.17 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.16% | 19.95% |
| Max drawdown | -34.01% | -44.18% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to URTH and EEMA
Explore further