Screener
URTH vs EEM
iShares MSCI World ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- URTH costs 0.48% less per year.
- EEM is significantly larger than URTH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- URTH covers global markets; EEM covers emerging markets.
- EEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| URTH | EEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9.2B | $28.1B |
| Since | 2012 | 2003 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | 1.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.3% | +46.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.2% | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.1% | +7.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.17 | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.16% | 19.54% |
| Max drawdown | -34.01% | -39.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to URTH and EEM
Explore further