Screener
URTH vs EEMS
iShares MSCI World ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- URTH costs 0.48% less per year.
- URTH is significantly larger than EEMS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- URTH covers global markets; EEMS covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, URTH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| URTH | EEMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9.2B | $452M |
| Since | 2012 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | 2.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.3% | +30.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.2% | +17.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.1% | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.17 | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.16% | 16.93% |
| Max drawdown | -34.01% | -48.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to URTH and EEMS
Explore further