Screener
URTH vs EFA
iShares MSCI World ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Key differences
- URTH costs 0.08% less per year.
- EFA is significantly larger than URTH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- URTH covers global markets; EFA covers global ex us.
- Over the last 3 years, URTH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| URTH | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9.2B | $75.6B |
| Since | 2012 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | 3.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.3% | +22.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.2% | +16.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.1% | +8.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.17 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.16% | 15.12% |
| Max drawdown | -34.01% | -34.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to URTH and EFA
Explore further