Screener
URTH vs IVV
iShares MSCI World ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Key differences
- IVV costs 0.21% less per year.
- IVV is significantly larger than URTH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- URTH covers global markets; IVV covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, IVV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IVV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| URTH | IVV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9.2B | $797.5B |
| Since | 2012 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | 1.12% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.3% | +29.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.2% | +23.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.1% | +14.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.17 | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.16% | 11.96% |
| Max drawdown | -34.01% | -33.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to URTH and IVV
Explore further