Screener
URTH vs OEF
iShares MSCI World ETF vs iShares S&P 100 ETF
Key differences
- URTH covers global markets; OEF covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, OEF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- OEF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| URTH | OEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9.2B | $19.6B |
| Since | 2012 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | 0.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.3% | +31.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.2% | +25.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.1% | +15.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.17 | 1.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.16% | 12.88% |
| Max drawdown | -34.01% | -31.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to URTH and OEF
Explore further