Screener
URTH vs MCHI
iShares MSCI World ETF vs iShares MSCI China ETF
Key differences
- URTH costs 0.35% less per year.
- URTH covers global markets; MCHI covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, URTH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| URTH | MCHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9.2B | $6.7B |
| Since | 2012 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | 2.21% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.7% | +3.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.1% | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | -5.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.17 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.17% | 20.00% |
| Max drawdown | -34.01% | -62.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to URTH and MCHI
Explore further