Screener
URTH vs QEFA
iShares MSCI World ETF vs State Street SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF
Key differences
- URTH costs 0.06% less per year.
- URTH is significantly larger than QEFA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, URTH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| URTH | QEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9.2B | $1.1B |
| Since | 2012 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | 2.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.3% | +19.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.2% | +14.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.1% | +8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.17 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.16% | 12.83% |
| Max drawdown | -34.01% | -31.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to URTH and QEFA
Explore further