Screener
URTH vs RING
iShares MSCI World ETF vs iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- URTH costs 0.15% less per year.
- URTH is significantly larger than RING — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RING has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| URTH | RING | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9.2B | $2.9B |
| Since | 2012 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | 0.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.7% | +77.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.1% | +46.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | +19.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.17 | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.17% | 46.02% |
| Max drawdown | -34.01% | -52.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to URTH and RING
Explore further