Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

USE vs HFMF

USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund vs Unlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETF

USE

USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$2M

HFMF

Unlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETF

Annual cost

0.97%

Fund size

$23M

Key differences

Both USE and HFMF are alternative ETFs. USE charges 0.79% a year and HFMF 0.97%. The main difference: USE follows a multi strategy strategy; HFMF uses active selection.

  • USE follows a multi strategy strategy; HFMF uses active selection.
  • USE costs 0.18% less per year.
  • HFMF is much larger than USE. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

USEHFMF
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.97%
Fund size (AUM)$2M$23M
Since20232025
Dividend yield2.21%
Asset classalternativealternative
Region
Strategymulti strategyactive selection
CAGR 1Y+34.1%N/A
CAGR 3Y+17.5%N/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y0.60N/A
Volatility 1Y31.73%
Max drawdown-26.24%-11.09%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to USE and HFMF