Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

USE vs PIT

USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund vs VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF

USE

USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$2M

PIT

VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF

Annual cost

0.55%

Fund size

$264M

Key differences

USE is an alternative ETF, while PIT is a commodity ETF. USE charges 0.79% a year and PIT 0.55%.

  • USE is an alternative fund, while PIT is a commodity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • PIT costs 0.24% less per year.
  • PIT is much larger than USE. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, PIT has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

USEPIT
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.55%
Fund size (AUM)$2M$264M
Since20232022
Dividend yield2.21%6.52%
Asset classalternativecommodity
Region
Strategymulti strategy
CAGR 1Y+34.1%+57.0%
CAGR 3Y+17.5%+23.9%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y0.601.11
Volatility 1Y31.73%21.51%
Max drawdown-26.24%-12.27%

Similar to USE and PIT