Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

USE vs HARD

USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund vs Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF

USE

USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$2M

HARD

Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF

Annual cost

0.78%

Fund size

$114M

Key differences

USE is an alternative ETF, while HARD is a commodity ETF. USE charges 0.79% a year and HARD 0.78%.

  • USE is an alternative fund, while HARD is a commodity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • HARD is much larger than USE. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, USE has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

USEHARD
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.78%
Fund size (AUM)$2M$114M
Since20232023
Dividend yield2.21%3.40%
Asset classalternativecommodity
Region
Strategymulti strategy
CAGR 1Y+34.1%+19.8%
CAGR 3Y+17.5%+11.9%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y0.600.49
Volatility 1Y31.73%26.58%
Max drawdown-26.24%-13.51%

Similar to USE and HARD