Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

USO vs UNG

United States Oil Fund, LP vs United States Natural Gas Fund, LP

USO

United States Oil Fund, LP

USCF Investments

Annual cost

0.86%

Fund size

$1.9B

UNG

United States Natural Gas Fund, LP

USCF Investments

Annual cost

1.17%

Fund size

$533M

Key differences

  • USO costs 0.31% less per year.
  • USO is significantly larger than UNG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, USO has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

USOUNG
Annual cost (TER)0.86%1.17%
Fund size (AUM)$1.9B$533M
Since20062007
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Asset classcommoditycommodity
Region
Strategy
CAGR 1Y+92.7%-33.6%
CAGR 3Y+27.0%-27.9%
CAGR 5Y+24.7%-23.5%
Sharpe 3Y0.76-0.32
Volatility 1Y44.02%60.76%
Max drawdown-86.75%-93.55%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to USO and UNG