Screener
UWM vs RWM
ProShares Ultra Russell2000 vs ProShares Short Russell2000
Key differences
- UWM follows a leveraged strategy; RWM uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, UWM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| UWM | RWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $248M | $143M |
| Since | 2007 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.83% | 3.99% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +91.3% | -28.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.5% | -13.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.8% | -6.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | -0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 38.22% | 19.17% |
| Max drawdown | -71.46% | -73.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to UWM and RWM
Explore further