Screener
VB vs DFAS
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares vs Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF
Key differences
- VB costs 0.23% less per year.
- VB is significantly larger than DFAS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VB follows a index tracking strategy; DFAS uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, VB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DFAS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VB | DFAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $177.4B | $14.0B |
| Since | 2004 | 1998 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 0.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.2% | +28.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.5% | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.76 | 0.67 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.41% | 16.89% |
| Max drawdown | -42.05% | -26.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VB and DFAS
Explore further