Screener
VB vs DFSV
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares vs Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- VB costs 0.27% less per year.
- VB is significantly larger than DFSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VB follows a index tracking strategy; DFSV uses active selection.
- VB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VB | DFSV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $177.4B | $7.5B |
| Since | 2004 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 1.43% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.2% | +35.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.5% | +17.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.76 | 0.71 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.41% | 17.83% |
| Max drawdown | -42.05% | -28.02% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VB and DFSV
Explore further