Screener
VFLO vs USVM
Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF vs VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
Key differences
- USVM costs 0.10% less per year.
- VFLO is significantly larger than USVM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- USVM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VFLO | USVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.7B | $1.6B |
| Since | 2023 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.31% | 1.79% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.1% | +32.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.22% | 15.03% |
| Max drawdown | -17.78% | -42.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VFLO and USVM
Explore further