Screener
VFLO vs ULVM
Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF vs VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF
Key differences
- ULVM costs 0.19% less per year.
- VFLO is significantly larger than ULVM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ULVM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VFLO | ULVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.7B | $249M |
| Since | 2023 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.31% | 1.63% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.1% | +29.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.22% | 10.88% |
| Max drawdown | -17.78% | -40.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VFLO and ULVM
Explore further