Screener
VFMF vs DFUV
Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF Shares vs Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF
Key differences
- DFUV is significantly larger than VFMF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VFMF follows a index tracking strategy; DFUV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, VFMF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DFUV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VFMF | DFUV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.21% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $601M | $14.4B |
| Since | 2018 | 1998 |
| Dividend yield | 1.41% | 1.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.9% | +33.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.8% | +19.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.12 | 1.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.26% | 11.87% |
| Max drawdown | -41.34% | -17.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VFMF and DFUV
Explore further