Screener
VFMF vs DXUV
Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF Shares vs Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF
Key differences
- VFMF costs 0.07% less per year.
- VFMF follows a index tracking strategy; DXUV uses active selection.
- VFMF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VFMF | DXUV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $601M | $398M |
| Since | 2018 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.41% | 0.99% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.9% | +28.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.12 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.26% | 12.87% |
| Max drawdown | -41.34% | -21.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VFMF and DXUV
Explore further