Screener
VFMV vs ACWV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF ETF Shares vs iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
Key differences
- VFMV costs 0.07% less per year.
- ACWV is significantly larger than VFMV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VFMV covers north america markets; ACWV covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, VFMV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ACWV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VFMV | ACWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.13% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $421M | $3.3B |
| Since | 2018 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.94% | 2.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.2% | +5.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.5% | +9.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.2% | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.10 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.86% | 7.75% |
| Max drawdown | -33.64% | -28.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VFMV and ACWV
Explore further