Screener
VFMV vs CFA
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF ETF Shares vs VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF
Key differences
- VFMV costs 0.22% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, VFMV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| VFMV | CFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.13% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $421M | $532M |
| Since | 2018 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 1.94% | 1.25% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.2% | +14.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.5% | +14.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.2% | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.10 | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.86% | 10.91% |
| Max drawdown | -33.64% | -37.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VFMV and CFA
Explore further