Screener
VHT vs BMED
Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares vs iShares Health Innovation Active ETF
Key differences
- VHT costs 0.46% less per year.
- VHT is significantly larger than BMED — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VHT follows a index tracking strategy; BMED uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, VHT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- VHT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VHT | BMED | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $18.5B | $10M |
| Since | 2004 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.72% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.3% | +18.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.3% | +4.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.7% | +0.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.26 | 0.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.23% | 14.93% |
| Max drawdown | -28.85% | -36.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VHT and BMED
Explore further