Screener
VNM vs KPHO
VanEck Vietnam ETF vs KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF
Key differences
Both VNM and KPHO are equity ETFs. VNM charges 0.66% a year and KPHO 1.03%. The main difference: VNM covers the Asia-Pacific region; KPHO covers emerging markets.
- VNM covers the Asia-Pacific region; KPHO covers emerging markets.
- VNM costs 0.37% less per year.
- VNM is much larger than KPHO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- VNM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VNM | KPHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 1.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $570M | $13M |
| Since | 2009 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.20% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.54 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.82% | — |
| Max drawdown | -51.67% | -14.34% |
Similar to VNM and KPHO
Explore further