Screener
VO vs MMID
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares vs MFS Active Mid Cap ETF
Key differences
- VO costs 0.56% less per year.
- VO is significantly larger than MMID — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VO follows a index tracking strategy; MMID uses active selection.
- VO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VO | MMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $213.8B | $34M |
| Since | 2004 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.42% | — |
| Max drawdown | -39.37% | -7.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VO and MMID
Explore further