Screener
VOO vs XMLV
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF
Key differences
- VOO costs 0.22% less per year.
- VOO is significantly larger than XMLV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, VOO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| VOO | XMLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6T | $750M |
| Since | 2010 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 1.08% | 2.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.5% | +10.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.2% | +11.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.0% | +6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.97% | 10.30% |
| Max drawdown | -33.99% | -39.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VOO and XMLV
Explore further