Screener
XMLV vs IVOO
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF vs Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- IVOO costs 0.18% less per year.
- IVOO is significantly larger than XMLV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IVOO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XMLV | IVOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $750M | $5.4B |
| Since | 2013 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 2.80% | 1.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.0% | +24.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.5% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.1% | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 0.72 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.30% | 15.69% |
| Max drawdown | -39.86% | -42.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XMLV and IVOO
Explore further