Screener
VPC vs VRIG
Virtus Private Credit ETF vs Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
Key differences
- VRIG costs 10.30% less per year.
- VRIG is significantly larger than VPC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VPC is classified as equity, while VRIG is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- VPC follows a index tracking strategy; VRIG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, VRIG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| VPC | VRIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 10.60% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $33M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2019 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 16.57% | 4.86% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -10.7% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.4% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.5% | +4.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.05 | 2.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.06% | 0.50% |
| Max drawdown | -53.45% | -13.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VPC and VRIG
Explore further