Screener
VPX vs XMLV
Variant Perception Cycle Aware US Equity ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF
Key differences
- VPX follows a active selection strategy; XMLV uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| VPX | XMLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $750M |
| Since | — | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +10.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +11.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.30% |
| Max drawdown | -5.91% | -39.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VPX and XMLV
Explore further