Screener
VRIG vs BKLN
Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF vs Invesco Senior Loan ETF
Key differences
- VRIG costs 0.35% less per year.
- BKLN is significantly larger than VRIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VRIG follows a active selection strategy; BKLN uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, BKLN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- BKLN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VRIG | BKLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $6.8B |
| Since | 2016 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 4.86% | 6.91% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.0% | +5.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.1% | +7.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.4% | +5.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 2.92 | 1.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.50% | 2.75% |
| Max drawdown | -13.04% | -24.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VRIG and BKLN
Explore further