Screener
VRIG vs PICB
Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF vs Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- VRIG costs 0.20% less per year.
- VRIG is significantly larger than PICB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VRIG follows a active selection strategy; PICB uses index tracking.
- PICB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VRIG | PICB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $360M |
| Since | 2016 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 4.86% | 3.29% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.1% | +4.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.1% | +5.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.4% | -2.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 2.90 | 0.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.50% | 7.88% |
| Max drawdown | -13.04% | -37.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VRIG and PICB
Explore further