Screener
VRP vs PFFV
Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF vs Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF
Key differences
- PFFV costs 0.25% less per year.
- VRP is significantly larger than PFFV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, VRP has delivered higher annualized returns.
- VRP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VRP | PFFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.6B | $302M |
| Since | 2014 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 6.39% | 8.13% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.4% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.4% | +8.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.4% | +2.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.46 | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.87% | 4.20% |
| Max drawdown | -46.04% | -18.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VRP and PFFV
Explore further