Screener
PFFV vs VRIG
Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF vs Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
Key differences
- VRIG is significantly larger than PFFV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PFFV follows a index tracking strategy; VRIG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, PFFV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFFV | VRIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $302M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2020 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 8.13% | 4.86% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.6% | +5.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.7% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.6% | +4.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.79 | 2.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.20% | 0.50% |
| Max drawdown | -18.95% | -13.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFFV and VRIG
Explore further