Screener
VSMV vs ACWV
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF vs iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
Key differences
- ACWV costs 0.15% less per year.
- ACWV is significantly larger than VSMV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VSMV covers north america markets; ACWV covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, VSMV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ACWV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VSMV | ACWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $153M | $3.3B |
| Since | 2017 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.32% | 2.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.6% | +5.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.6% | +9.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.20% | 7.75% |
| Max drawdown | -31.33% | -28.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VSMV and ACWV
Explore further