Screener
VTWG vs SMDV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund ETF Shares vs ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF
Key differences
- VTWG costs 0.34% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, VTWG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- VTWG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VTWG | SMDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.06% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $661M |
| Since | 2010 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 2.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +40.5% | +15.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.0% | +10.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.0% | +4.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 0.44 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.49% | 15.90% |
| Max drawdown | -42.07% | -34.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VTWG and SMDV
Explore further