Screener
VTWV vs BSMC
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund ETF Shares vs Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- VTWV costs 0.65% less per year.
- VTWV is significantly larger than BSMC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VTWV follows a index tracking strategy; BSMC uses active selection.
- VTWV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VTWV | BSMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.06% | 0.71% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $164M |
| Since | 2010 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.62% | 0.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +44.2% | +26.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.77 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.29% | 14.75% |
| Max drawdown | -45.73% | -19.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VTWV and BSMC
Explore further