Screener
VWO vs MEM
Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund vs Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- VWO costs 0.73% less per year.
- VWO is significantly larger than MEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VWO follows a index tracking strategy; MEM uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, MEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- VWO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VWO | MEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.06% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $159.9B | $53M |
| Since | 2005 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 2.48% | 3.06% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.1% | +52.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.3% | +23.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.70% | 20.59% |
| Max drawdown | -36.39% | -19.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VWO and MEM
Explore further