Screener
WARP vs ARKQ
VanEck Space ETF vs ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
Key differences
- WARP costs 0.25% less per year.
- WARP follows a index tracking strategy; ARKQ uses active selection.
- ARKQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| WARP | ARKQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $2.1B |
| Since | 2026 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.24% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +79.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +42.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 32.45% |
| Max drawdown | -3.24% | -59.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to WARP and ARKQ
Explore further