Screener
WARP vs LFEQ
VanEck Space ETF vs VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF
Key differences
- WARP costs 0.08% less per year.
- WARP is classified as equity, while LFEQ is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- WARP covers global markets; LFEQ covers north america.
- WARP follows a index tracking strategy; LFEQ uses tactical allocation.
- LFEQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| WARP | LFEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $29M |
| Since | 2026 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +30.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.11% |
| Max drawdown | -3.24% | -35.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to WARP and LFEQ
Explore further