Screener
WDIV vs ADIV
State Street SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF vs Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF
Key differences
- WDIV costs 0.38% less per year.
- WDIV is significantly larger than ADIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- WDIV follows a index tracking strategy; ADIV uses active selection.
- ADIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| WDIV | ADIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.78% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $266M | $55M |
| Since | 2013 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 4.07% | 2.78% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.8% | +19.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.6% | +17.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.0% | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.17% | 13.26% |
| Max drawdown | -42.34% | -31.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to WDIV and ADIV
Explore further