Screener
WEBS vs CHAU
Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2X Shares
Key differences
- WEBS costs 0.12% less per year.
- CHAU is significantly larger than WEBS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- WEBS covers north america markets; CHAU covers emerging markets.
- WEBS follows a inverse strategy; CHAU uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, CHAU has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| WEBS | CHAU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.07% | 1.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $104M |
| Since | 2019 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 3.22% | 1.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -31.4% | +73.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | -51.5% | +10.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -37.9% | -8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.83 | 0.37 |
| Volatility 1Y | 56.72% | 33.23% |
| Max drawdown | -99.60% | -78.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to WEBS and CHAU
Explore further