Screener
WRTH vs LJAN
Worth Charting Options Income ETF vs Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - January
Key differences
- LJAN costs 0.23% less per year.
- WRTH follows a option income strategy; LJAN uses structured outcome.
Side-by-side comparison
| WRTH | LJAN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.02% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $12M |
| Since | 2026 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +6.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 2.54% |
| Max drawdown | -0.64% | -4.83% |
Similar to WRTH and LJAN
Explore further