Screener
WZRD vs LCR
Opportunistic Trader ETF vs Leuthold Core ETF
Key differences
- LCR costs 0.16% less per year.
- LCR is significantly larger than WZRD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- WZRD is classified as alternative, while LCR is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- WZRD follows a structured outcome strategy; LCR uses active selection.
- LCR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| WZRD | LCR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $70M |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.35% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | structured outcome | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +14.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +11.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 7.52% |
| Max drawdown | -71.81% | -17.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to WZRD and LCR
Explore further