Screener
WZRD vs MATE
Opportunistic Trader ETF vs Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF
Key differences
- MATE is significantly larger than WZRD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- WZRD covers north america markets; MATE covers emerging markets.
- WZRD follows a structured outcome strategy; MATE uses tactical allocation.
Side-by-side comparison
| WZRD | MATE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.97% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $37M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | structured outcome | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -71.81% | -13.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to WZRD and MATE
Explore further