Screener
XBJL vs QTJA
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July vs Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January
Key differences
- XBJL is significantly larger than QTJA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, QTJA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XBJL | QTJA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $74M | $17M |
| Since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.1% | +29.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.2% | +18.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.25% | 10.91% |
| Max drawdown | -11.78% | -36.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XBJL and QTJA
Explore further